Evaluation Process

Double Review

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double review process to ensure academic rigor, objectivity, and scholarly integrity.

1. Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, each manuscript is first screened by the editorial team to determine its relevance to the journal’s scope, adherence to formatting guidelines, and overall academic merit.

2. Double Peer Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent anonymously to two independent reviewers who are experts in the field. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:

• Originality and contribution to the field
• Clarity of objectives and argumentation
• Methodological soundness
• Analysis and interpretation of results
• Relevance to the journal’s scope

3. Reviewer Recommendations

Each reviewer provides detailed feedback and recommends one of the following actions:

• Accept without revision
• Accept with minor revisions
• Revise and resubmit (major revisions required)
• Reject

4. Editorial Decision

The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers' reports. In cases of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer may be invited, or the editorial board may deliberate further.

5. Revisions and Final Acceptance

Authors are given an opportunity to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer comments. Once all required revisions are satisfactorily addressed, the manuscript is accepted for publication.

This process ensures that all published articles meet the highest standards of academic quality and relevance.